BurrrrrrrRRRRRRRRRoooooooooommmmm!!!

SandViper

Viper Owner
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
113
Reaction score
0
Im not much into rims. I like stock over anything else, The wheels on that car look great on it. Does anyone know what size they are?
 

plumcrazy

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Posts
16,243
Reaction score
7
Location
ALL OVER
stock motor i assume ? hope its got a fuel system on it. sounds great and i like the wheels
 

Red Snake

Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Posts
2,048
Reaction score
0
Location
NashVegas
Their estimated flywheel numbers are WAYYYY off.


  • HP is now at 703 (at the wheels) which equates out to about 892 HP at the flywheel.
  • TQ is now at 762 (at the wheels) which is approx 967 TQ at the flywheel.
It would be more like 787 HP and 853 TQ (or about 12% more, not 27%). ;) Still very nice rear wheel numbers.
 
OP
OP
N

notixplz

Enthusiast
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
61
Reaction score
0
Answers to your questions...

- 20" all the way around, Iforged "Classics"
- Not a stock motor, a few minor upgrades and yes it has a fuel system (or it wouldn't run!!! jk, yes upgraded one plum)
- This is pushing 9lbs of boost (motor was built on 9.5:1 ratio so i know i could push 14/15lbs...just not right now)

Thanks gents!
 

Russ M

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 1, 2000
Posts
2,315
Reaction score
0
Location
LA, California
If this is 9 psi then that dyno is about 60-70 hp on the hi side, unless you have very well ported heads and other mods to increase the flow from factory considerably.

703rwhp is roughly 780 crank hp on a viper these things are right around 11-13% drive train loss.

Judging by your torque numbers this motor is far from minor mods, or the dyno is far from truth. Typical paxton cars on stock or near stock motors make less torque than hp, the numbers reverse when the motor gets significant flow upgrades.
 
OP
OP
N

notixplz

Enthusiast
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
61
Reaction score
0
If this is 9 psi then that dyno is about 60-70 hp on the hi side, unless you have very well ported heads and other mods to increase the flow from factory considerably.

703rwhp is roughly 780 crank hp on a viper these things are right around 11-13% drive train loss.

Judging by your torque numbers this motor is far from minor mods, or the dyno is far from truth. Typical paxton cars on stock or near stock motors make less torque than hp, the numbers reverse when the motor gets significant flow upgrades.

lol depends on your definition of minor sir. Ill tell ya, everything was upgraded but the heads and cam :drive:
 

plumcrazy

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Posts
16,243
Reaction score
7
Location
ALL OVER
is that max power at ~4200 rpms ?

i must be seeing this wrong. the power curve doesnt seem to jive with the psi/afr chart. or is it me ?
 

Russ M

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 1, 2000
Posts
2,315
Reaction score
0
Location
LA, California
Your looking at the torque curve, but after looking at the other chart I understand whats going on.

The a/f is good its on the right, the left side is the psi and this car is making at least 13 so that explains the hp.
 

Jack B

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Posts
3,483
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
Their estimated flywheel numbers are WAYYYY off.


It would be more like 787 HP and 853 TQ (or about 12% more, not 27%). ;) Still very nice rear wheel numbers.

Mileage also impacts the numbers, as the car ages, the driveline losses actually go up. 12% is a good number, but, it could be a bit higher on a high mileage car. The number also has to be based on direct coupling or 4th gear in a T56.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
153,139
Posts
1,681,567
Members
17,641
Latest member
chadlick32
Top