2008 SRT Dyno #'s

Timnineside

Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Posts
1,302
Reaction score
3
Location
West Michigan
All stock. I'm happy with theses numbers. Now, I'm wondering if I should pull the mufflers off.....

You must be registered for see images attach
 

ZZ SRT

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Posts
166
Reaction score
0
Good numbers!

I am considering the same this winter, although I have decided I am going with either the Roe HF catted pipes or the Random Tech HF catted pipes (cuts it from 4 cats to 2 HF cats) and then replace the mufflers with Magnaflow 5x14" mufflers.

Depends whether you are looking to free up the system for a little more power or simply for sound, but for power, I would think lessening the restriction closer to the manifolds would make a bigger difference than deleting the mufflers further downstream.
 

Green viper 1

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Posts
358
Reaction score
0
I have a brand new set of roe high flow cats if anyone is interested was going to use them but I decided to remove my cats
 

SilveRT8

Enthusiast
Joined
May 9, 2008
Posts
1,288
Reaction score
0
Location
Boucherville, Quebec, Canada
I have a brand new set of roe high flow cats if anyone is interested was going to use them but I decided to remove my cats

One of my first mod was a set of Roe H/F cats, keeping stock mufflers
Dyno went from 545 hp to 563. Great bang for the buck, and the difference in sound is similar to installing an aftermaket catback
 
OP
OP
T

Timnineside

Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Posts
1,302
Reaction score
3
Location
West Michigan
One of my first mod was a set of Roe H/F cats, keeping stock mufflers
Dyno went from 545 hp to 563. Great bang for the buck, and the difference in sound is similar to installing an aftermaket catback

Did you do the install yourself? If so was it difficult? Also was this just the cats, or mopar PCM with it?

Thanks,

-Tim
 

351carlo

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Posts
474
Reaction score
0
Location
Northern Delaware
Congrats, I'm sure the car runs very well.

One word of caution comparing your numbers, your dyno operator chose to use STD Values instead of SAE. SAE numbers correct to different temperature, pressure and humidity conditions than STD, so numbers from one cannot be compared to the other without adjusting. There is an approximate 4.5% bump your numbers get from this choice, and the reason why it's popular. SAE you'd see closer to 520.

This is just one of the many reasons a dyno should be used to get baselines and relative gains, or more importantly a tool for tuning.

With regards to exhaust, the restriction will be your primary catalytic converters, followed by your secondary and the mufflers will be much less.
 
OP
OP
T

Timnineside

Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Posts
1,302
Reaction score
3
Location
West Michigan
Congrats, I'm sure the car runs very well.

One word of caution comparing your numbers, your dyno operator chose to use STD Values instead of SAE. SAE numbers correct to different temperature, pressure and humidity conditions than STD, so numbers from one cannot be compared to the other without adjusting. There is an approximate 4.5% bump your numbers get from this choice, and the reason why it's popular. SAE you'd see closer to 520.

This is just one of the many reasons a dyno should be used to get baselines and relative gains, or more importantly a tool for tuning.

With regards to exhaust, the restriction will be your primary catalytic converters, followed by your secondary and the mufflers will be much less.

Thanks! I was aware, and as stated using this for a baseline. It was just for fun to see where things are. The car has some miles on it, so it's nice to know where she stands as if now.

I have been thinking about pulling the cats and buying the mopar racing PCM. Any thoughts on that?

-Tim
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
153,232
Posts
1,682,218
Members
17,721
Latest member
cookviper
Top