I'm still running my millenium laptop so it works for me but the photos doesn't excite me. Is it me or does the coupe look uninteresting in the front 1/4 shot while aggressive in the rear 3/4 shot. Comparitively, the GTS used to look equally good from both shots. (No, not another GTS v/s SRT thread)
avi I think it looks "not so great" in certain shots just because its a very angular car with very sharp edges. Curvier designs like the GTS looks good in most respects because of the way light and cameras caputure its essence. Pictures don't seem to bring out the best features of angular designs. The new coupe is one badass **** in any picture to me, and in person it is THE best looking viper to date imho.
also, if you look at the first shot, you cannot really make out the depth of the side indentations the car has. The rear shot gives a better view of that "crazy" line. The first shot is a perfect example of how lighting and photographs do not show the beauty of a great angular design.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.