DCPerformance.tv is Launched!

Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Posts
78
Reaction score
0
As a way to involve our clients with the daily going-ons at the DC Performance shop, DCPerformance.tv was launched! It is meant as a way to highlight some of the exciting projects as we complete them so that the people that haven't had a chance to stop by can check out the type of stuff we have "laying around" the shop at any given time.


As of now, we have dyno videos of everything from Corvette Z06s to Volkswagen GTIs...


Click Here For DCPerformance.tv!

Here is the dyno video of one of our clients, Doc Holiday, and his 2008 Viper!

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUM_HOVN-8M[/media]
 
Last edited:

Austin

Enthusiast
Joined
May 29, 2003
Posts
5,076
Reaction score
0
Location
Clear Lake, TX
Cool site. Im curious as to why you're using the DynaPack over a standard rolling Dyno? It seems like a lot of work to have to take off the wheels just to do a dyno. Are they more efficient and effective? Do they give better and more accurate numbers?
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
3,091
Reaction score
0
Location
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Cool site. Im curious as to why you're using the DynaPack over a standard rolling Dyno? It seems like a lot of work to have to take off the wheels just to do a dyno. Are they more efficient and effective? Do they give better and more accurate numbers?

To answer your question from a good source from a marketing aspect:

The first and most obvious difference is the elimination of the tire to roller interface on a conventional roller dyno.

The Dynapack eliminates this variable by using a hub adapter that provides a direct coupling to our Power Absorption Units. There can be no tire slip, no rolling resistance, and no chance of the vehicle coming off of the dyno at high speeds.

Notice its called a variable. Sometimes it may be a problem area, other times it may not. Tire temperature, pressure, traction, etc, are all variables that can change - not only from run to run, but during the run as well.

Throw an unknown variable like this into the equation and your data has now become subject to a potentially high margin of error. It is obviously better if these variables could be eliminated - which is exactly what is done. There are other associated problems with the roller method as well. Take tie-down straps for example, most roller dyno's use ratcheting tie-down straps to attempt to hold the vehicle in position while being tested. If the straps are cinched down tightly, the tire has become loaded even further, in an unpredictable manner.

While this may be good for enhancing traction, it changes the rolling resistance of the tire - skewing the data further. Since these tie-down straps aren't perfect, the vehicle squirms around on the rollers - dramatically changing the tire drag during the run. If the vehicle is tested in two different sessions, the straps can't be set exactly the same way twice in a row. Again, the data will be inconsistent.

We have heard of cases where the ratcheting tie-down straps were loosened by two clicks and the measured power increased by ten horsepower. What if the straps stretch - either from run to run, or during the run itself? Wouldn't it be great if all of these problems could disappear? With a Dynapack™, they were never there in the first place.

Another major difference is the effect of inertia.
Street wheels and tires spinning at high RPM have a large amount of inertia. A large steel drum spinning at the same ground speed has much more inertia. What you end up with is a giant, heavy flywheel attached to your engine. The inertia is such that just trying to accelerate the mass of the roller is a substantial load for the engine. That is the principle that some roller dyno's (or ìinertia dyno's as they are also called) operate on. Accelerate a known mass to a measured speed over a given time and it can be calculated to equal a certain amount of power. There is nothing wrong with this theory, but like many theories, its application in the real world can be troublesome.

How do you think your measurements will be effected by being subjected to this large heavy flywheel phenomenon? Will small fluctuations be noticeable? In a word, no, the flywheel effect tends to take small rapid variations and smooth them right out - as energy that should be going into the dyno is being wasted trying to accelerate a large lump of steel. This is great if you want your power curve to look like a smooth pretty line, but it doesn't give you much insight into what is really occurring. What if you eliminated this flywheel effect?

The inertia of a Dynapack is practically zero.

This allows us to precisely measure and display tiny rapid pulses and oddities that you may not have seen before. Now you have a window into areas that no roller dyno will allow you to see. Another benefit of having virtually zero inertia is the ability to change the rate of acceleration at will. In many situations, you may want to accelerate the vehicle at a different rate to simulate a specific condition. With a few simple keystrokes, we allow you to make the vehicle accelerate very quickly, slowly, or anywhere in between. Because of our lack of inertia and total control of the engine speed, we give you choices that none of our competitors can even dream of - and as you know, choices are good!
 

Austin

Enthusiast
Joined
May 29, 2003
Posts
5,076
Reaction score
0
Location
Clear Lake, TX
To answer your question from a good source from a marketing aspect:

The first and most obvious difference is the elimination of the tire to roller interface on a conventional roller dyno.

The Dynapack eliminates this variable by using a hub adapter that provides a direct coupling to our Power Absorption Units. There can be no tire slip, no rolling resistance, and no chance of the vehicle coming off of the dyno at high speeds.

Notice its called a variable. Sometimes it may be a problem area, other times it may not. Tire temperature, pressure, traction, etc, are all variables that can change - not only from run to run, but during the run as well.

Throw an unknown variable like this into the equation and your data has now become subject to a potentially high margin of error. It is obviously better if these variables could be eliminated - which is exactly what is done. There are other associated problems with the roller method as well. Take tie-down straps for example, most roller dyno's use ratcheting tie-down straps to attempt to hold the vehicle in position while being tested. If the straps are cinched down tightly, the tire has become loaded even further, in an unpredictable manner.

While this may be good for enhancing traction, it changes the rolling resistance of the tire - skewing the data further. Since these tie-down straps aren't perfect, the vehicle squirms around on the rollers - dramatically changing the tire drag during the run. If the vehicle is tested in two different sessions, the straps can't be set exactly the same way twice in a row. Again, the data will be inconsistent.

We have heard of cases where the ratcheting tie-down straps were loosened by two clicks and the measured power increased by ten horsepower. What if the straps stretch - either from run to run, or during the run itself? Wouldn't it be great if all of these problems could disappear? With a Dynapack™, they were never there in the first place.

Another major difference is the effect of inertia.
Street wheels and tires spinning at high RPM have a large amount of inertia. A large steel drum spinning at the same ground speed has much more inertia. What you end up with is a giant, heavy flywheel attached to your engine. The inertia is such that just trying to accelerate the mass of the roller is a substantial load for the engine. That is the principle that some roller dyno's (or ìinertia dyno's as they are also called) operate on. Accelerate a known mass to a measured speed over a given time and it can be calculated to equal a certain amount of power. There is nothing wrong with this theory, but like many theories, its application in the real world can be troublesome.

How do you think your measurements will be effected by being subjected to this large heavy flywheel phenomenon? Will small fluctuations be noticeable? In a word, no, the flywheel effect tends to take small rapid variations and smooth them right out - as energy that should be going into the dyno is being wasted trying to accelerate a large lump of steel. This is great if you want your power curve to look like a smooth pretty line, but it doesn't give you much insight into what is really occurring. What if you eliminated this flywheel effect?

The inertia of a Dynapack is practically zero.

This allows us to precisely measure and display tiny rapid pulses and oddities that you may not have seen before. Now you have a window into areas that no roller dyno will allow you to see. Another benefit of having virtually zero inertia is the ability to change the rate of acceleration at will. In many situations, you may want to accelerate the vehicle at a different rate to simulate a specific condition. With a few simple keystrokes, we allow you to make the vehicle accelerate very quickly, slowly, or anywhere in between. Because of our lack of inertia and total control of the engine speed, we give you choices that none of our competitors can even dream of - and as you know, choices are good!


Good info. Thanks for posting this.
 

Dan Cragin

Legacy/Supporting Vendor
Supporting Vendor
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Posts
1,273
Reaction score
39
Location
LA, CA
Thanks for the help outlining the Dyna-Pack advantages.

At DC Performance we have both Dynojet and Dynapack dynamometers. The Dynojet (roller type) is easy to use and great for before and after dyno testing. The Dynapack dyno is more labor intensive setting up, but is far superior for tuning and calibration work. With this dyno we can tune your vehicle under controlled loads for spot on performance and driveabilty.

When it comes to Viper tuning, we have years of experiance. If you have a calibration or tuning issues we can help.

I hope you all like DC TV, we have some great features planned, stay tuned.
 

bushido

Viper Owner
Joined
Jun 22, 2009
Posts
822
Reaction score
0
Location
Monterey,CA
but is far superior for tuning and calibration work. With this dyno we can tune your vehicle under controlled loads for spot on performance and driveabilty.

.

That is a fact. You guys did a fantastic job tuning my car on the dynopack.

I want to also thank you for the great work you did on my GTS ( heads cam install). My car doesnt even buck or surge at lower rpms and is ripping fast to. Matter of fact it idles and cruises better compared to when I had the stock 708 cam..

Lee







You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Dan Cragin

Legacy/Supporting Vendor
Supporting Vendor
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Posts
1,273
Reaction score
39
Location
LA, CA
Thanks Lee,

Your Viper had some serious power numbers for a heads and cam combination. Thanks for working with us to get the right parts for the best power.

We had to experiment with compression ratio and header design to reach this power.
 

bushido

Viper Owner
Joined
Jun 22, 2009
Posts
822
Reaction score
0
Location
Monterey,CA
Thanks Lee,

Your Viper had some serious power numbers for a heads and cam combination. Thanks for working with us to get the right parts for the best power.

We had to experiment with compression ratio and header design to reach this power.

Thanks Dan, See you soon for the upgraded fans..:D

Lee
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
153,218
Posts
1,682,059
Members
17,714
Latest member
potterb4
Top