HP & Torque Loss?

Chuck 98 RT/10

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 15, 2000
Posts
17,923
Reaction score
0
Location
tampa, fl USA
Rule of thumb is if you have a low HP car blame it on drivetrain loss.

Generally 12 to 15% won't get a BS flag but I suspect it's more like 9 to 12%.
 
OP
OP
S

SSLIDER

Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Posts
120
Reaction score
0
Location
Sunnyvale, Calif, USA
Hey Chuck....the car is a 95 Z28 Camaro. Motor has just been completed (383, 8.5:1 compression, centrifugal blower with 5 psi boost, full cam, heads, forged internals, the whole works). It dynoed out at 461 HP and 442 lb. ft. of torque at the wheels. I was just trying to figure out the flywheel HP & Torque. Is that called the bhp too?

Craig
 

Chuck 98 RT/10

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 15, 2000
Posts
17,923
Reaction score
0
Location
tampa, fl USA
Yes, BHP is crank HP.

Just tell people what it dyno'd at and let them speculate BHP. You're over 500. That's a nice round number.
 

Nuck

Viper Owner
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Posts
161
Reaction score
0
Location
Alberta
The weight of the drivetrain is the big cause of parasitic horsepower loss. It doesn't change as the horsepower goes up but frictional losses would be somewhat higher. There is no basis to assume a constant percentage of loss as the power goes up. It is not really a percentage of anything. There is simply a certain number of horsepower claimed by parasitic loss. That is why 300hp cars seem to lose 15% with a manual tranny and 450hp cars lose 10-12%. With more gear on gear pressure and greater fluid resistance in the tranny and diff as the power goes up you can expect there has to be some increase in the loss but it would be less of a factor than rim, flywheel, or driveshaft weight and obviously much less than all these combined.
 
Top