Throttle-Body Controversy! "What's Best"

Tom F&L GoR

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 3, 2000
Posts
4,984
Reaction score
7
Location
Wappingers Falls
Re: Throttle-Body Controversy! \"What\'s Best\"

Question & Comments
Air velocity was important for carburetors to get the right signal that would meter the proper amount of fuel; too big a throttle bore and not enough fuel was sucked in. Throttle response suffered because the mixture would run lean and even if you richen the jet, the air speed wasn't as high and the intake charge was not as well mixed.
In a fuel injected engine, the fuel is well vaporized for you by the injector nozzle; not only that, the ECU has already figured out how much fuel you need. Airspeed through the throttle body doesn't matter. And regardless of throttle size, the manifold air pressure (MAP) or mass air flow sensor signal is what matters, and for a given load, they won't change.
You might get too large a throttle body so that the throttle position sensor seems to tell the ECU that it's not open very far, while it is actually flowing more air, resulting in a somewhat false signal, but I would expect the ECU learning to eventually factor this out.
So unless the throttle body is the restriction, there won't be a power gain, but I don't see how it can be a torque loss (unless the TPS signal is way off.) Help me out to understand this?
 

Bill Pemberton Woodhouse

VCA Member
Supporting Vendor
Joined
Jul 25, 2000
Posts
5,212
Reaction score
6
Location
Blair,Nebraska,USA
Re: Throttle-Body Controversy! \"What\'s Best\"

You guys are right on. We dyno'd Woodhouse's Viper and Rob Foster's ( Both GT-1 racers in Viper Days ) , and they both lost power with the bigger throttle bodies - it was a substantial loss,too!!! Selling what works is why Jon B has a good rep, as opposed to just giving the customer what he wants when you know full well it doesn't have any true benefit.
 
OP
OP
T

Tom F&L GoR

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 3, 2000
Posts
4,984
Reaction score
7
Location
Wappingers Falls
Re: Throttle-Body Controversy! \"What\'s Best\"

AAACCCKKK! Why?
Fred's example shows essentially no difference (I can believe this) and Bill's shows a power loss (I have trouble with this one.) Why? The two plenums isolate the runners from any flow characteristics the throttle bodies may cause, the runner diameter and length should be all the intake port and valve care about... why does the larger throttle body affect max flow rate, runner/port tuning, or ram air effects? I would think that is why the plenums are there...
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2000
Posts
2,381
Reaction score
0
Location
Saratoga,CA
Re: Throttle-Body Controversy! \"What\'s Best\"

Tom's explanation was demonstrated at Caldwell when Dan Cragin provided a larger throttle body to evaluate on a 635 hp (crank hp). The dyno results with a larger throttle body had 1 hp and 1 foot pound of torque gain. Was the gain a dyno resolution number? Even with JonB's Mods, Bigger is not always better.
 
Top