Car and Driver First Drive Review

Early93Viper

Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 18, 2004
Posts
1,799
Reaction score
0
Location
Kansas
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2013-srt-viper-viper-gts-coupe-first-drive-review

You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
First Drive Review
arrow
[h=1]2013 SRT Viper / Viper GTS Coupe[/h][h=2]All the venom with a little less sting.[/h]
You must be registered for see images
The Viper is back, new and vastly improved after more than two years in stasis. Chief among the tweaks to the fifth iteration of the new SRT brand’s headline supercar (it’s no longer a Dodge) are a more upscale interior and increased creature comforts. Has the Viper gone soft? In a single word, no. But after a half-day sneak preview at GingerMan Raceway in South Haven, Michigan—where we previously captured some shakedown images and video—we can say with confidence that the new Viper is not only better than ever, it’s finally as appealing in person as it is on paper.
A Quantum Leap, Albeit Without Scott Bakula
At a distance, the Viper looks a lot like the previous car, and the two even share the same windshield. But up close, the new car is far more elegant. There are no hard creases despite some sharp-ish features, and the hood gives off a menacing vibe reminiscent of something dreamt up by H.R. Geiger. In comparison, the previous-generation Viper looks dated, even clumsy. There are two Viper models, base and GTS, most obviously differentiated visually by the number of hood vents; the uplevel GTS has only two versus the regular car’s six. Every vent or scoop is functional on both models, from the rear-brake ducts behind the side windows to the outboard inlets in the front fascia that funnel a drag-reducing curtain of air around the front wheels.
The old Viper SRT10 is on hand to help make dynamic comparisons, and driving it definitely brings back memories, the most dominant of which is that it was kind of a pain in the ass. You don’t get behind the wheel so much as you contort your body into something resembling a driving position. Visibility is poor, and the passing of time has only made the rental-grade interior look even more appalling. As for the chassis, a few laps around GingerMan remind that the old Viper’s high limits are best approached with caution.
Slide into the new Viper and it’s hard to believe it’s just three model years removed from its predecessor. Soft leather and vinyl replace hard plastic. The thin, firm seats (supplied by Sabelt, which also counts Ferrari among its customers) immediately feel more comfortable, and are more adjustable than before. They’re also mounted an inch lower, resulting in more headroom and a roomier overall feel. The center tunnel also is lower, putting the shifter in a more natural position that allows you to change gears more with your wrist than your forearm. And the cabin is less of a sweatbox now that the exhaust doesn’t cross over below the occupants, although the threat of seared calf flesh remains—while the pipes now run only along the side of the body, the still heat up the rockers and terminate behind the doors.
As Able as Ever—and Less Intimidating
Improvements extend beyond ergonomics and into the chassis. A revised steel frame and an extruded-aluminum X-brace that spans the engine bay increase stiffness by a claimed 50 percent. The front track is pushed out, and the front tires are wider by 20 mm. At the rear, rubber engorged by 10 mm (Pirellis that now measure 355/30-19) shrouds a revised suspension with a relocated toe link and softer anti-roll bar. The changes are immediately noticeable on the track. Steering loads increase more naturally in concert with cornering forces, and turn-in is more immediate. But mostly the Viper feels more stable, more confidence-inspiring. The front now leads the rear axle through a corner, a contrast with the impression in the old Viper that the two are fighting each other for control of the car’s vector. Breakaway behavior, both via brake-induced understeer or throttle-induced oversteer, is now entirely predictable. The limits are even higher than before, but this Viper is easier to drive quickly.
The dynamic improvements are underscored by the safety net of stability control, which now is essentially required by the government for all cars. Retired Viper chief engineer Herb Helbig used to opine that a good right foot was all the traction control anyone needed, and Viper purists might be understandably annoyed by the presence of electronic driver aids, but we doubt it will hamper sales. Plus, as it can in the rest of the SRT vehicle lineup (which retain Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep branding) the system can be fully switched off.
Further niceties like launch control (enabled by the stability-control computers), cruise control, and available satellite navigation are more a sign that the Viper has stepped into the 21st century rather than a transgression against its original intent as a modern Shelby Cobra. With a sticker price close to $100,000, a certain level of luxury is expected, especially if Chrysler is to succeed in attracting new buyers. As such, all Vipers come with a leather-topped dashboard, an 8.4-inch infotainment screen, and a digital IP display shared with the Dart that shows an analog-style tachometer. Plastic and fiberglass body panels give way to carbon fiber and aluminum, which not only save about 60 pounds but also yield more consistent panel gaps. (Or will on the final production version, as Chrysler stressed to us that the prototypes we drove were not representative from a fit-and-finish standpoint).
Viper die-hards might take solace in the base model, which comes with manual seats and simple on-off functionality for the stability control. The GTS is lined with more leather, and an optional Laguna interior raises the cowhide grade to something approaching Italian. Commanding a premium of roughly $20,000, the GTS also has a high-threshold Sport mode and traction-control-free Track mode baked into the stability control, along with two-mode cockpit-adjustable shocks. Those dampers, supplied by Bilstein, straddle the single tune of the base car’s and adjust both jounce and rebound rates for their respective street or track settings. The other main option is a Track package that yields lightweight wheels, two-piece aluminum-hat StopTech brake rotors, and stickier P Zero Corsa footwear. The pack was fitted to one of our preview cars, and the tires improve grip and feel so much that we wish they were standard. The cars can be outfitted with carbon-fiber trim inside and out, and all Viper buyers will get a one-day track experience.
Ferociously Quick
Chrysler’s quest to turn the Viper into a true GT—that is to say a car that can be driven across the country and then straight onto a racetrack—has not diminished its ferocity. The old 8.4-liter V-10 is massaged to 640 hp and 600 lb-ft of torque, increases of 40 in both categories. Curb weight is down by about 100 pounds in the base model, and the track package drops about 40 more. The power-to-weight ratio of the Viper is as low as 5.2:1, on par with the Corvette ZR1 and better than the Lamborghini Aventador. And more evenly spaced gear ratios take better advantage of that power: We estimate a 0-to-60-mph run of 3.4 seconds and the 206-mph top speed is now reached in sixth gear, which previously only existed to boost highway fuel economy. That said, EPA ratings will be lower on this Viper, not that anybody will care.
Some might still wonder if any essential Viper-ness has been lost. Many of the traits that gave the Viper its charm were also glaring faults, though, and, as a rule, we’re not sad to see them go: At some point, a car’s essence transcends design and engineering peculiarities carried out in the name of heritage. The new car is more comfortable and easier to drive, but still feels authentic—you can tell it’s a Viper because of the way it is. View Photo Gallery
 

Bobpantax

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 2, 2000
Posts
6,957
Reaction score
3
Location
Miami
I am glad that he liked it but his remarks about the Gen IV indicate that he is a bit of a twerp.
 

swexlin

Viper Owner
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Posts
1,357
Reaction score
0
Location
West Chester, PA
I am glad that he liked it but his remarks about the Gen IV indicate that he is a bit of a twerp.

Agreed. All these reviews posted this morning, all of a sudden, a Gen IV is crude trash. Funny, I always thought it was supposed to be one of the best performing cars on the planet.

And the seats? The SRT seats in both my Viper and Charger are some of the most comfy I've ever been in.
 

PDCjonny

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
5,999
Reaction score
3
I really didn't realize till now what a piece of **** my Gen 4 ACR is.
Funny....the crudity and ferocity used to be the attraction of the Viper, of course not for a delicate guy like this writer.
Now if it's not leather wrapped and color matched stitching it's crap.
 

Bobpantax

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 2, 2000
Posts
6,957
Reaction score
3
Location
Miami
It's weird that none of drivers brought along any equipment to get some numbers. Maybe it was not allowed. Alot of words with no concrete data.
 

bcmarly

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 9, 2012
Posts
271
Reaction score
0
It's weird that none of drivers brought along any equipment to get some numbers. Maybe it was not allowed. Alot of words with no concrete data.

I would expect full tests next month. It's not uncommon to give first impression teaser drives followed by complete and detailed analysis.
 

klamathpro

Viper Owner
Joined
Oct 7, 2005
Posts
925
Reaction score
0
Location
Detroit
"...as Chrysler stressed to us that the prototypes we drove were not representative from a fit-and-finish standpoint"

Thank You. The gaps were really bothering me. What gets me though, is that the launch edition has a cheap blacked out rear trim, but the yellow base has a body colored rear trim. I think the black trim would look better on the yellow viper. The GTS would look better body colored.
 
Last edited:

Bobpantax

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 2, 2000
Posts
6,957
Reaction score
3
Location
Miami
It's not bullet proof but a GTech could have given some rough data. Although doesn't the Gen V have a data display on the dash? If I recall correctly, it does. Maybe it was not activated. Or, as KD said above, the data is embargoed.
 

SnakeBitten

Enthusiast
Joined
May 18, 2001
Posts
2,550
Reaction score
0
Didnt like reading that the Gen V is on par with the older ZR1. Whats the point of that especially with a new ZR1 right around the corner? Id imagine its just his opinion and that the eventual performance data will show the Gen V is faster even if its just a tenth or two and 1-2 mph in the 1/4 and 1 mile...Probably a tall order given it has just 640hp and the ZR1's tq comes on sooner.
 
Top