Viper Grenade
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2010
- Posts
- 325
- Reaction score
- 0
If you can make it have a real working cruise control and be able to tune not just fuel and spark but also the cam...i would be interested.
Forgot to add...E85 flex fuel ability.
If you can make it have a real working cruise control and be able to tune not just fuel and spark but also the cam...i would be interested.
Forgot to add...E85 flex fuel ability.

Cam Control? Cruise Control? E85?
I have a Pectel system with your name on it! You dont get top-shelf standalone features without buying a top-shelf standalone, lol.

and this guy wonders why nobody is doing builds with him.
![]()
![]()
I was referring to you gaving a ********* answer. Your "My **** don't stink" attitude is your own undoing. As far as anyone can tell your no better tuner than Larry Macedo.
What I am offering is NOT a true standalone, it is about halfway to one. What I was hoping, is that everyone would have figured out by now that there will likely NEVER be flash tuning for the Gen-4. People have been complaining for years that there were no other options other than Mopar or Standalone. Well, this one sits dead in the middle, yet everyone is still saying too expensive... Seems like its a losing proposition for me.
With this middle of the road system, specifically what power adder options do I have if I want to stay NA? I can imagine the throttle response issue could be fixed and also raise the rpm limit if the engine is built to take it.
The traditional SCT system with the Gen 3 allows you to do the head, cam, etc upgrade, right? For the Gen 4, if I'm understanding you correctly, the cam is a limiting issue and if it is changed, then we start getting back into the stand alone system, right?
I'm just trying to get clarification here, your responses are technical, but honestly crap from a marketing side when describing what your are trying to sell me, how much it is going to cost and what I can expect. I understand your point that no two horsepower outputs are going to be the same because each build and modification will yield a different outcome. But your attitude almost sounds like the Nancy Polesi argument of vote for Obama Care and then you can find out what is in the bill....not fair to us non tuners that are just trying to figure out what the hell is possible, capable and feasible with this damn Gen 4 computer and motor we are stuck with.
Don't feel discouraged Dan. Those of us that know how to build/tune cars here (very few) understand what you are asking, and what to expect. The others simply need your guidance and your parts, as they likely wouldn't understand the differences between each system.
Think of it this way, would more people buy Gen 4 cars to modify, if they were only $4K more and could be tuned? Heck yes, they would. The Gen 3 coupe is holding excellent value now, being the only late model coupe that can be readily tuned. $4K is not a lot of money, relative to a $70-80K used car price. Also, if Gen 4 owners would adopt this idea, it would actually help maintain the values of their cars in the long-run. Spend $4K now and have some fun, or simply lose $4K+ in value over a short time.
So, Are you going to build a Paxton package for the Gen 4? Would love to see some real #'s and a possible price.....
Question guys:
I am entertaining another possibility... using different hardware to gain even more control, and possibly using the Paxton route to offset the design costs since it will likely increase sales drastically.
Three questions:
1. Since we were at the ~4.5K ballpark before for Fuel/Ignition control, would the ~5.5K ballpark be reasonable for also gaining control of the camshaft, elimination of drive by wire (Throttle Lag) issues, and also having true standalone expansion capability?
2. If I could package a Paxton kit in a "bolt on" configuration for the Gen-4, including the above system, for the 14-15K ballpark, in the 700-750RW range, would I have buyers? [This setup would be Piston Limited]
3. If I could expand the previous kit by offering a "bolt-on" package including all of the above, but with a set of drop-in pistons, full gasket set, and a different calibration in the 17.5K ballpark, for 850RWHP, would I have buyers?
Keep in mind, this setup would be using an extremely expandable ECU, and has many capabilities that could be unlocked if needed or pushed further.
Hey Dan hope all is well! to hard for me to read through all the posts and subsequent comments. To your question, and from my perspective, I'd be in for NA power adders at $100 per RW HP, but I have to be able to pass CA smog. I'm at the wall at 602 with headers/exhaust, ported intake and heads. Maybe pay a little higher for improved drivability functionality. Keep us posted and thanks!! Mike
If the difference is $1k to gain control of all of that stuff, then in my mind that would be $1k well spent.
Without the Paxton (or Procharger) kit, Gen 4 owners have no real incentive to buy this ECM. So, it is a good idea to offer it as an entire package.
If a tuned H/C Gen 3 can put down 575-625 at the wheels, would a tuned H/C Gen IV be able to put down 675-725?
Yes, in effect. The hold up however is that the Gen-4/5 camshaft is not as easily "replaced" by something aftermarket. The Gen-3 has cam cores on the shelf. The Gen-4/5 does not. Its not as easy to re-grind such a camshaft either. Short of going to a solid cam [which would be an easy option with this setup... but will make smog more difficult] we would be stuck with the PROFILE of the G4 or 5 camshafts. Luckily, they are not tiny camshafts, and should be able to get the job done at an acceptable level, especially with the ability to articulate them. This is ONLY a Big Build NA issue though, the cam is fine for FI.
All that said, there are already 650 RWHP Gen-4's out there with port work, and still running an incomplete tuning solution. Pulling another 25+HP out of those should not be a problem.