1996 & 97 GTS 1/4 Times

JohnnyLightning

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Posts
97
Reaction score
0
I was wandering with the forge internals & heavy cam what are people running stock on their GTS. Was the 96-99 faster in the quarter mile than 00-02. I have heard from the grapevine the 96-97 with that cam stock lowering pressure in the rear tires ran
12.3s & 00-02 ran 12.5s with a good driver. The .2s difference was because of cam & forged internals. Not talking ACRs because have seen where 99 ran a 12.1 stock. This same person also told me in 96 & 97s were the fastest of any of the GTSs.
 
OP
OP
J

JohnnyLightning

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Posts
97
Reaction score
0
Also anyone have time slips from a 96 or 97 GTS with only mods of belanger headers, random tech x-pipe with no cats and of course smooth tubes:omg: LOL.....
 

99 R/T 10

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 4, 2001
Posts
10,314
Reaction score
0
Location
Enterprise, AL USA
Times for all the cars thru 2002 are going to be close, will really depend on the driver. The fasted tested car was a 2000 RT/10 that went 11.7 at 119 I think. The biggest difference would be if you plan to add FI or NOS to your car. It would be better to go with a 1996-1999 due to the forged internals(assuming you don't want to have to open up the engine).

With your mods(belanger headers, random tech x-pipe with no cats ), I would say high 11's on a good pass as about 120.
 
OP
OP
J

JohnnyLightning

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Posts
97
Reaction score
0
Times for all the cars thru 2002 are going to be close, will really depend on the driver. The fasted tested car was a 2000 RT/10 that went 11.7 at 119 I think. The biggest difference would be if you plan to add FI or NOS to your car. It would be better to go with a 1996-1999 due to the forged internals(assuming you don't want to have to open up the engine).

With your mods(belanger headers, random tech x-pipe with no cats ), I would say high 11's on a good pass as about 120.

How is a RT faster than a GTS...I have seen stock RTs consistently run high 12s with gen II motor not gen I where GTS run mid 12s stock...The same driver ran a high 12 in a 01 RT consitently switched to a 99 ACR ran low 12s all stock....Same night...Just wander always thought GTS are faster...:dunno:
 

Burntrubber

Viper Owner
Joined
Oct 27, 2007
Posts
358
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
96 GTS w/ just K&N's

12.5 @ 118 mph / 2.2 60' / first time ever at a 1/4 strip.
First time launching the car.:drive:
 

99 R/T 10

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 4, 2001
Posts
10,314
Reaction score
0
Location
Enterprise, AL USA
How is a RT faster than a GTS...I have seen stock RTs consistently run high 12s with gen II motor not gen I where GTS run mid 12s stock...The same driver ran a high 12 in a 01 RT consitently switched to a 99 ACR ran low 12s all stock....Same night...Just wander always thought GTS are faster...:dunno:


Like I said, depends on the driver, mods etc. The 11.77 was achieved thru one of the magazines. If you do a search in the archives, there was a few threads on it. Asked the same question you did, but got to remember that at the end of the 1/4, areodynamics don't play as big of a role as they would past 150.
 
OP
OP
J

JohnnyLightning

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Posts
97
Reaction score
0
96 GTS w/ just K&N's

12.5 @ 118 mph / 2.2 60' / first time ever at a 1/4 strip.
First time launching the car.:drive:

12.5 not bad where you running stock mich tires with 17inch rims? Those tires are like hockey pucks bet you could drop .2 of a second on the 60 foot with sticker tires...:2tu:
 

Burntrubber

Viper Owner
Joined
Oct 27, 2007
Posts
358
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
12.5 not bad where you running stock mich tires with 17inch rims? Those tires are like hockey pucks bet you could drop .2 of a second on the 60 foot with sticker tires...:2tu:


46k miles on the car, Stock 17" rims, michelin sports I believe. Oh...and a very abused clutch, it is amazing the abuse these things can take! On the same day I watched a granny-shifted 11.2second 96 GTS, head work, headers, full exhaust & 3.55's on slicks. He did 11.4 on street tires!
 

radta7

Viper Owner
Joined
Jul 29, 2003
Posts
1,451
Reaction score
0
Location
Roselle, IL
I thought Car and driver ran an 11.9 in a 97 GTS against a 911 turbo in one of there magazines. It was on the cover I believe.
 

XLR8

Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Posts
284
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa Arizona
96 GTS with exhaust, head work and Ross pistons. It was the first time at the tack wth this car so I was doing a check it out run. I ran an 11.206 at 123.409 mph and got told to slow down or go home. So I lowed down and ran a 11.564 at 123.167. So I quit before I got kicked out.
 

Disturbed

Viper Owner
Joined
May 20, 2007
Posts
753
Reaction score
0
Location
Orlando, FL
I was wandering with the forge internals & heavy cam what are people running stock on their GTS. Was the 96-99 faster in the quarter mile than 00-02. I have heard from the grapevine the 96-97 with that cam stock lowering pressure in the rear tires ran
12.3s & 00-02 ran 12.5s with a good driver. The .2s difference was because of cam & forged internals. Not talking ACRs because have seen where 99 ran a 12.1 stock. This same person also told me in 96 & 97s were the fastest of any of the GTSs.



Back when my 01 ACR was stock I ran a 12.2@118 with a 1.9 60ft, 35psi in the rear tires. I think the record for a GenII is 11.8@120mph bone stock. I have the vid some place. It was a Bumble Bee GTS.

When it comes to drag racing, the ACR should be a bit slower off the line (due to 1100ft-lb springs in the rear) but a little better on the top end (due to tubes and filters). It really evens out.

Currently I've run a 11.1@131mph with a 1.9 60ft time. I afraid I'm going to bust a half-shaft at the rate I'm going. Heads, exhaust and a crower stg 1 street cam (same as a 708).

You can hit mid 10's in a heads cam STREET viper if it's set up right. Just a set of BFG's (or Kumho's) a Good cam and Good Heads ;) A mph of 135 can be reached.
 
Last edited:

BigCarrot

Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 3, 2002
Posts
2,940
Reaction score
0
Location
Dallas, TX
I ran 11.46 in my '99 ACR at the first Viper Nationals in San Antonio. The only mods were deleted cats and BFG drag radials.
 
OP
OP
J

JohnnyLightning

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Posts
97
Reaction score
0
That is awesome guys thanks so much for your replys...I also remember some article discussing a stock GenII running 11.9s.....
 

djacob372

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Posts
80
Reaction score
0
RT's are lighter then GTS with the same power = faster in a straight line. Keep in mind that the viper was designed as a convertible so the GTS isn't much if any stiffer then the RT. The advantage of the GTS is mostly aerodynamics which don't come into play much in the 1/4 mile.
 

agentf1

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Posts
2,608
Reaction score
0
Location
Phila Suburbs
I have actually heard from reliable sources that the creampuff cam cars was actually quicker than the lumpy cam cars. This is a very heated topic on these forums and is almost as bad as the Gen II vs Gen III debate. :nono: My opinion is there really isn't much difference between any of them and it mostly depends on the driver. And I obviously prefer the Gen II. ;) :lmao:
 

Landman

Viper Owner
Joined
Mar 7, 2006
Posts
191
Reaction score
0
Location
West Virginia
RT's are lighter then GTS with the same power = faster in a straight line. Keep in mind that the viper was designed as a convertible so the GTS isn't much if any stiffer then the RT. The advantage of the GTS is mostly aerodynamics which don't come into play much in the 1/4 mile.
I've actually heard the GTS was lighter. Whats the difference?
 

Landman

Viper Owner
Joined
Mar 7, 2006
Posts
191
Reaction score
0
Location
West Virginia
I have actually heard from reliable sources that the creampuff cam cars was actually quicker than the lumpy cam cars. This is a very heated topic on these forums and is almost as bad as the Gen II vs Gen III debate. :nono: My opinion is there really isn't much difference between any of them and it mostly depends on the driver. And I obviously prefer the Gen II. ;) :lmao:
I've heard the creampuff was quicker stock, but the forged was better to mod.
 

plumcrazy

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Posts
16,243
Reaction score
7
Location
ALL OVER
the fastest was paul, ran 11.71 in a stock RT at Atco with the top off

BONE STOCK and a creampuff i think.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
153,214
Posts
1,682,015
Members
17,708
Latest member
xeng yang
Top