It is against federal law, I believe about the cat removal. The loophole is if the part is defective. I am sure the WAY TOO HOT cats in a stock viper would qualify for that. <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Makara:
I understand that the whole magnusson vs. moss act pretty much protects the consumer from warranty voids from problems unrelated to mods done to a car, but am I wrong in thinking that changing cats will void a warranty on a new car? Am I wrong here? I want to put some high flows on my GTS when I put my new exhaust on next week but I don't want to mess with warranty issues.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>