While it may be in a better position than a Gen2 NACA duct, the hood scoop on the Gen3 doesn't seem overly large. Has anyone done any calculations regarding the CFM requirements of the Gen3 engine vs the area of the hole in the hood?
A well regarded flowbench operator in the area mentioned to me just last week that if things are restricted at or near the entrance, then anything happening further into the engine's intake plumbing is automatically starting from no more than, and often less than, the less than 100% that the restriction at the entrance is allowing.
Testing I did on a Gen2 with the airbox modified to only allow air from the hood's opening showed me that there just wasn't enough air getting to the engine via the NACA duct alone.
A well regarded flowbench operator in the area mentioned to me just last week that if things are restricted at or near the entrance, then anything happening further into the engine's intake plumbing is automatically starting from no more than, and often less than, the less than 100% that the restriction at the entrance is allowing.
Testing I did on a Gen2 with the airbox modified to only allow air from the hood's opening showed me that there just wasn't enough air getting to the engine via the NACA duct alone.