VEC2 RELATED TUNING ISSUE

Torquemonster

Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
2,174
Reaction score
0
Location
Auckland, New Zealand
There has been some excellent dialogue on the "How Much Timing Can A NA Viper Take?" where an issue surfaced surrounding problems some people are having with VEC2 equipped Vipers.

This is not a criticism or necessarily even a fault with the VEC2 itself - but a problem that some cars are experiencing that nobody seems to have solved yet.

It seems to me that the issue is common enough to justify a think tank on a seperate thread because the solution once found is going to benefit everyone with the problem and it is something I know all tuners and DIY guys will want to be up to speed on incase they ever encounter it.

Sean Roe made an excellent post about this on the other thread and has promised to modify the VEC2 if that proves to be the source of the issue - OR - to update the trouble shooting manual and instructions if there is something that needs to be done outside the VEC2 when installing it that will eliminate this problem. I applaud this and we need to support him by doing what we can to solve this mystery.

In a nut shell - what happens is that when certain cars affected hit an rpm level - which is different on different cars - it can be 3200rpm, 4500rpm or even up to 5200rpm.... the engine will hit a flat spot and drop power like it does not want to rpm more, or does but sounds terrible. Almost like it drops a cylinder.

There have been some suggestions that dropping timing out at the rpm range affected helps - it will be interesting to see if some have had this problem running factory timing tables or pulling timing OUT eg. on boosted applications.

Let's use this thread to share the nature of the problem, suggestions on what it may be and how to fix it - and experiences that have solved it for you. Together a solution will be found and this is a great use of the forum because the VEC2 is an important asset in this community.

BTW - somebody asked so here is the answer - AEM does not have this problem (to the best of my knowledge so far) - but AEM is not for the novice either and it costs a LOT more than a VEC2. I support both AEM and the VEC2 because they both fill different needs and market segments - we really need them both.
 

pauls

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 13, 2000
Posts
865
Reaction score
0
Location
Akron, Oh USA
I had this problem after my install. ( I use stock Map) Sounded flat with no power on anything other than a stock card "zeros" I put on the recommended extra ground and it seemed to solve it. Even dyno'd the car with some good results. Then driving home it just went flat again. Checked all my connections, still flat. I found a coil wire slightly loose (not all the way popped down, but still connected) and since popping it down everything has been OK. Question is how did the wire get loose? Can something in the programs effect the coil? Or was it like that and just lost it's connection by accident?
 

pullshard

Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 9, 2004
Posts
179
Reaction score
0
I'm having a VEC2 installed on my paxton car. I will post later on how it works.
 

dblankenbaker

Viper Owner
Joined
Oct 3, 2000
Posts
383
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
I found a coil wire slightly loose (not all the way popped down, but still connected) and since popping it down everything has been OK. Question is how did the wire get loose? Can something in the programs effect the coil? Or was it like that and just lost it's connection by accident?

The VEC2 installation requires wrestling with a wiring harness connection under the coilpacks. It would be easy to knock a coilpack wire loose.

I had a similar problem (engine hit a wall at 3,200rpm w/spark advance) with the VEC2 on my 99 ACR. I backed the timing out (thinking the previous owner might have had the PCM flashed w/timing advance) and the problem went away. I haven't looked into it further... yet.

Dave
 

FE 065

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 3, 2001
Posts
2,292
Reaction score
0
Location
MI
I was at first wondering if the problem is related to intake manifold secondary resonances disturbing fuel air mixture in that particular rpm range. Hence the factory's reason for having less timing in that earea for a span of rpm before it picks up rpm again. Since it's not a problem on Roe cars-forced induction might just be overpowering intake runner resonance where n/a cars have to endure it. But the V notch drop in power not a problem on all Vipers, and 99.99% of all Vipers are using the same intake. So the intake tract length is the same in all instances; ruling out resonance in just some cars.



Added on smooth tubes of different sources/sizes probably wouldn't be a factor either since all terminate in an airbox of some sort in just about the OEM location, and the Helmholtz resonating theory doesn't really apply to an engine using 5 cylinders into one plenum anyway. So the intake tract length is the same for all Vipers..



Dyno Dave on this board should be able to add some information to this discussion. He's dynoing engines every day for DC.
 

Sean Roe

Supporting Vendor
Supporting Vendor
Joined
Sep 19, 2000
Posts
1,714
Reaction score
0
Location
Jacksonville, FL
.... I found a coil wire slightly loose (not all the way popped down, but still connected) and since popping it down everything has been OK. ...

Hi Paul, I'm glad, in a funny sort of way, to hear this. Your old VEC2 has been on my '96 for the last three weeks. I put about 32 miles on it 5 days a week (home to shop) and have not had any problems with it. Glad to hear you found something. Have you re-dyno tested yet?

Regards,
Sean
 

KenH

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 7, 2001
Posts
1,462
Reaction score
0
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Has anyone noted a corrolation between using the stock MAP vs. the VEC2 internal MAP? All the SC guys are using the internal MAP as far as I know and I image that most NA guys are using the stock MAP like I am.
 

J DAWG

Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 9, 2002
Posts
2,238
Reaction score
0
Location
MS
Has anyone noted a corrolation between using the stock MAP vs. the VEC2 internal MAP? All the SC guys are using the internal MAP as far as I know and I image that most NA guys are using the stock MAP like I am.

have tried both unintentionally and intentionally and the same result.


Stock map is what one needs for the NA setup.
 

KenH

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 7, 2001
Posts
1,462
Reaction score
0
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Has anyone noted a corrolation between using the stock MAP vs. the VEC2 internal MAP? All the SC guys are using the internal MAP as far as I know and I image that most NA guys are using the stock MAP like I am.

have tried both unintentionally and intentionally and the same result.


Stock map is what one needs for the NA setup.

VEC2 documentation states that either can be used for NA, but sounds like you have already tried both.
 

Jack B

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Posts
3,486
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
The stumble is there on both MAP modes. There was absolutely no stumble when all VEC timing is removed. This is on four different cars.

It may be related to cylinder temperature since it does not act the same every time. The theory relating to intake runner issues may not be far off. Sean's experience is primarily with SC cars. The mass of the SC (heat sinks differently) plus the intake system is entirely different, therefore, the cars in his knowlege base may be immune because of those physical differences.

Another interesting issue is the factory timing curve which adds timing, pulls timing then adds timing, there has to be some issue is this area, perhaps the added timing via the VEC causes the increased cylinder temperature and subsequent pre-ignition. The cylinder pressure then decreases and the engine continues to climb.

Perhaps someone that is close to the factory engine program can inquire and get some ideas.
 
OP
OP
T

Torquemonster

Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
2,174
Reaction score
0
Location
Auckland, New Zealand
Freeflyer on the other site made a good suggestion....

"is there a way you can look at the stock timing table versus the VEC2 modified table? It could be that if the VEC2 table is advancing or retarding timing by X amount the problem occurs. If that is the case it might be a coil driver problem. Maybe the VEC2 can't process the signal fast enough to get accurate and repeatable results."

Sean can this be checked?
 
OP
OP
T

Torquemonster

Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
2,174
Reaction score
0
Location
Auckland, New Zealand
Top