The Honda you picked is a 2002.
The Honda you picked has the lowest miles.
I have no idea what the actual selling price would have been for any of these cars when new.
Craig, I'll have to say your argument seems a little weak.
You started out talking about the quality of the cars.
When it was pointed out that you were not comparing cars of similar prices, you changed the argument to resale value after 200k miles.
When it was pointed out that people just don't care what a car is worth after 200k miles, you changed the argument to auction prices of cars you picked to prove your point.
I don't know where you are going with this but you are beginning to look like what we used to call
a snob.
In the old days, 60s, Magazines like Car&Driver were filled with car snobs. Little sports cars were the thing and anything else was, shall we say, smelly.
You show contempt for any US made cars, claiming that the Euro/Japanese cars are better simply because you say they are.
You never answer any points brought against your argument.
Do you still have to change cam drive belts on Hondas? If so, doesn't the car have to go into the shop, just as if it had a problem?
A car designed with a belt change as regular maintenance?
Well,
Perhaps Hondas don't need that any longer. I don't know.
Let me give you a point for your side, Honda makes reliable cars.
OK, that's one for you.