I had them on my old Vette, and I have to say that while overall grip in the corners was slightly comprimised,I felt the initial turn-in with the run flats was superior to non-runflats. The car felt much more responsive and accurate with them. The negative sides were,
A) Cost, more money
B) Straight line traction, slightly worse
C) Noise, louder
D) Harder to mount, need a good installer
E) Slightly heavier, rotating mass
I actually changed mine in search of every ounce of weight reduction, remember it was a vette not a Viper. I was a little disappointed when I weighed my non run-flats, compared to the old run-flats. The old tires were only 1.25 lbs heavier, of course they were worn, but I thought the run-flats would have been much heavier. I think run-flats are getting a bad rap by people who are comparing them to a tire that is typically compounded completely different. Take the same Pilot tire, run-flat vs. non run-flat and your opinion may change.