What do you think of my dyno numbers?

[Blue Streak]

Well, I went to the dyno today and didnt know what to expect. Im pleased though with my results. What do you think? My car is a 96 GTS with K+N's, smooth tubes, Edelbrock headers, no cats, and a Bellanger catback. It did a best (though it was consistent)419.5 HP @5,300 , 452.7 @4,300. The A/F was very rich though. It went down to around 11.5 about midway and he said it made the meter jump around after that. I would post the graph but I dont know how.

This was on a Mustang dyno. I was told that if it was on a Dynojet that it would have been around 478HP. I think I need a VEC 2?

 

[TOOOFST]

Those #'s sound backwacks.The dynojet #'s may change a few HP,not 25RW.
Can you post the chart.
Those 96's are animals.
Where to go from here,
INFINITY AND BEYOND!

 

[RedEnuf93]

Send me the chart, I'll post it.

 

[Joseph Dell]

Not bad for a rich running stocker! Get that A/F up to 12.0 or 12.2 and advance the timing a little bit (ala a VEC2) and you'll be quite impressed. a bone-stock 97 (not even smooth tubes) was tuned by me using a VEC2 to 455rwhp and 477tq. The power of the VEC2 is quite nice!

JD

 

[Jack B]

The mustang dyno's have had such a bad wrap, they actually have a software patch that mirrors the results of a dynojet. You can tell the dyno operaor to do the pull with the mirroring patch.