PatentLaw
Enthusiast
Respectfully,
That is low..... For just city driving...... it is low.
That is low..... For just city driving...... it is low.

I get 4mpg at the track, 11.5 on the street.
RPMs go up. More rpm = less mpg.
Don't believe me? Fine. Maybe you will believe another source. Dodge itself says 11. 8.5 mpg is 30 percent low. See below...
2001 Dodge Viper Specs and Features - MSN Autos
Don't believe me? Fine. Maybe you will believe another source. Dodge itself says 11. 8.5 mpg is 30 percent low. See below...
2001 Dodge Viper Specs and Features - MSN Autos
Dodge also tells me to shift to second gear @ 15 miles an hour....do I have to do the math?

But when engine braking's being used, the throttle's not being used to keep the RPM up (except a blip to get in lower gear maybe..)...i.e. no extra fuel?

You seem to be missing the point. I do believe that in the manner in which the EPA has established the MPG for a 2001 Viper is 11 MPG. However, roffle waffle has already stated that he drives with a heavy foot. This is a huge factor in effecting the MPG and I'm shocked that you think it has no bearing on it.
LOL![]()
maybe summer gas already
and that is about right in my experience. without some highway miles (5th and 6th gear) sounds about right
ain't life grand
![]()
heavy footed, city driving will net that mpg.
Nick
You do a lot better than me. I however do drive it like I stole it daily.
+ 1
Mark
![]()
I get 4mpg at the track, 11.5 on the street.
Higway up to 20MPG, track around 3-5MPG.
And thats with blower...
Without the blower I got 23MPG from Myrtle Beach to Dallas, doing 55-65 on 6th.
There are so many variables, I don't think one can discern issues between 8.5 and 9.5 mpg as so many things can contribute to a +/- 10% change. I get about 9 in town so you're not too far off.
Always a good idea to put it on a dyno and check the A/F....can't hurt.
8.5mpg?
Lucky dog....
sounds normal to me...
Looks like it's right on with the in town and heavy foot factor!
I was getting 2.2 mpg at Willow Springs in my 96.
No...you seem to be missing the point. Many people who drive their car AT THE TRACK, are only getting marginally worse mileage. At the track I am sure that people are not using a skip shift. City driving is not nearly as bad as at the track. Driving with a heavy foot can hurt, sure. That is obvious.
Take some time to look at all the quotes that others have posted up in this thread. 2.2-5MPG at the track is not "marginally worse mileage." Aside from all the other people in this thread that have posted up that this is accurate with a HEAVY FOOT, from my own experience, I get about 9MPG if I am doing spirited driving. My O2's are less than a year old and less than 3000 miles. Sure the O2's can effect the mileage but if the guy has already stated that he drives with a heavy foot...I think that is the reason why he is getting 2.5 MPG less. By your own admission, driving ith a heavy foot can hurt. You also stated that the skip shift isn't used at the track...do you think it's used when driving with a heavy foot? No, it's not. How do you guys come up with your mpg urban figures?...do you fill up to full after every drive?...or actually go a whole tank just driving around town?? I could only give an average 16/17mpg figure for all drive types as thats what i do before putting in another 50ltrs...
How do you guys come up with your mpg urban figures?...do you fill up to full after every drive?...or actually go a whole tank just driving around town?? I could only give an average 16/17mpg figure for all drive types as thats what i do before putting in another 50ltrs...
We might be counting drops here but the engine is still sucking fuel in at a higher rate than at lower RPM. And if you're rev matching (that blip) that's a relatively healthy gulp of fuel. Wrong or right, I don't care to discuss it much more because fuel mileage is the very last thing I think about when I think of Vipers. In fact, I'll even concede that I'm wrong. That's how much I care.
![]()


Yep ... I get between 8 and 9 miles per (Imperial) gallon.![]()
Using Imperial gallons, the top end converts to 10.8 MPG US. Very close to what Dodge says that you should get for city driving. Sounds correct.
It still cracks me up that you think that the EPA MPG is the end all and that if someone is getting anything else, there MUST be a problem with their car. You should go look up how the EPA calculates their pre-2007 MPG. Again, you need to realize, like numerous people have said in this thread, that there are so many factors that go into what each person will get as far as city MPG in a Viper. The most important factor is how you drive the car. Telling people they should get what Dodge/EPA says is bad info. I don't get 11 MPG because I don't drive my Viper like a grandma and neither does so many other people. Besides the driving factor, there is also, climate, wind, tire pressure, altitude, and traffic.you're supposed to go full throttle in the first 2 gears, right?

Guess I have a light foot....
My gen 1 gets better mileage than any other car I own!!

Besides the driving factor, there is also, climate, wind, tire pressure, altitude, and traffic.
Using Imperial gallons, the top end converts to 10.8 MPG US. Very close to what Dodge says that you should get for city driving. Sounds correct.