Gen 1 oil catch can

maverickagm

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 9, 2023
Posts
109
Reaction score
64
Location
New Westminster
I installed an oil catch can. There were a pair of extra M4 studs near the PCM. I think they are there to mount an A/C accumulator, but my 93 doesn't have it.

I went with a Morosso 85481. For some reason this one was half off on Amazon. But it's the same can, with 3/8 fittings and plenty of 3/8 hose. I only had to buy an extra 3/8 elbow and some flat stock metal. I welded two flat stocks together then cut the Morosso bracket and welded that on too (grinding and paint make me the welder I ain't!).

I avoided some of the Mushimotos or similar clones that used sintered bronze. It's more air restriction than I'm comfortable with. The cheaper Evil Energy style are just a simple piece of steel wool material. It's better than nothing, but there's no effective baffling in them. If you open one, it looks baffled, but that's actually the inlet side and it just holds the steel wool in place.

I have Collector Plates, so if I have to, I can just undo two nuts on the mounting studs, then quickly swap the connections at the PCV valve and the whole thing comes out.

I'm curious what people's experiences are with this. I've had a similarily designed J&L can on my S197 for nearly a decade. It catches some oil and has never caused me a problem. Nothing to see there. I hope to have the same experience....

You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach


You must be registered for see images attach
 

GTS Dean

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 22, 2000
Posts
4,118
Reaction score
455
Location
New Braunfels, Texas
My thoughts as well! I would not expect to catch much with your setup though - the Gen1's have a very efficient baffle system in the valve covers to strip oil vapor out before leaving the engine. That's what I used as a basis for my Gen2, which was a terrible puker at the track before mods. Please give us a report in a few months!
 

Attachments

  • 2025 final a.jpg
    2025 final a.jpg
    176.1 KB · Views: 16
  • DW Viper DF-17 Catch Can.jpg
    DW Viper DF-17 Catch Can.jpg
    127.1 KB · Views: 16

serafins

Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 2, 2024
Posts
107
Reaction score
57
Location
Metro Detroit
I'm doing the same basic thing dean is on my Gen 2. With a couple minor differences.

I am running the Gen 3 intake, so I'm using an adapter in the spot the Gen 3 map sensor would normally mount to provide intake vacuum.

I ditched the crossover between the valve covers. The driver valve cover is vacuum side that runs from valve cover to catch can, to PCV, to intake. The passenger valve cover runs directly to the airbox. Will force clean air to go down, evacuate the crankcase, and come back up and out the other valve cover.

The factory design on the Gen 2 with the pcv in the intake valley is really interesting especially when these engines already have issues with oil staying wound around the crank. The flow of air is straight up out of the crank valley, which can't be conducive to putting oil back in the pan instead of keeping it suspended in the air around the crank. Or at some engine speeds it could conceivably just pull in fresh air only to send that same air right back out the pcv, with no effect on crankcase pressures. Can only figure it was done this way for emissions.
 

serafins

Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 2, 2024
Posts
107
Reaction score
57
Location
Metro Detroit
I have an evil energy catch can also. They actually make pretty good aluminum parts including AN fittings, for the price.
 

GTS Dean

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 22, 2000
Posts
4,118
Reaction score
455
Location
New Braunfels, Texas
I'm doing the same basic thing dean is on my Gen 2. With a couple minor differences.

The factory design on the Gen 2 with the pcv in the intake valley is really interesting especially when these engines already have issues with oil staying wound around the crank. The flow of air is straight up out of the crank valley, which can't be conducive to putting oil back in the pan instead of keeping it suspended in the air around the crank. Or at some engine speeds it could conceivably just pull in fresh air only to send that same air right back out the pcv, with no effect on crankcase pressures. Can only figure it was done this way for emissions.
So Sean - you're basically mirroring my setup - correct?

Behold: the dreaded Gen 2 PCV outlet box. It takes oil droplets flung off the top of the timing chain, then s*ck them straight out of the crankcase and into the intake manifold, and down the cylinder runners. Great design - NOT.
 

Attachments

  • Gen 2 PCV outlet.JPG
    Gen 2 PCV outlet.JPG
    81.4 KB · Views: 20
  • PCV box behind timing gear 2.jpg
    PCV box behind timing gear 2.jpg
    100.1 KB · Views: 20
Last edited:

serafins

Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 2, 2024
Posts
107
Reaction score
57
Location
Metro Detroit
So Sean - you're basically mirroring my setup - correct?

Behold: the dreaded Gen 2 PCV outlet box. It takes oil droplets flung off the top of the timing chain, then s*ck them straight out of the crankcase and into the intake manifold, and down the cylinder runners. Great design - NOT.
Yes pretty much. i Am still using the ports on the front of the valve covers though.
 
Top