Here's Chad's Snakeskin Green SRT being monitored on the assembly line.
![]()
You must be registered for see images
This topic will continue to always have 2 very opposite sides. I love the look and sound of a GTS. Its what people are used to and have seen for the last 10+ years. But as more and more people begin to see the SRT , it is what I think is the new favorite.
My buddy had a S/C B/W GTS, everyone liked it, but he has had just as many if not more looks and positive comments in the new 06 B/W Coupe. I used to love seeing his car in my rear view mirror or following his GTS. But now seeing his 06 Coupe, its just beautiful. Lowered on Motons,its bad a$$. And you cant argue technology. So Id always look to the new stuff. Better suspension, better driving, better brakes,etc. And as much as I love the GTS or even the first Viper, its a classic but dated. I like even the little things on the SRT like the newer looking headlights, the better looking stock wheels, 5 spoke of course, I like that they went back to side exhaust. It just looks cool.
I think alot of people have too much money and emotion ******* in there older Vipers, If money were not a factor, I think most would rather drive a Newer model. Spend a few days or weeks in a SRT and you will be sold.
If money were not a factor, I think most would rather drive a Newer model. Spend a few days or weeks in a SRT and you will be sold.
That's why people like me have two Viper's, both Gen 2's cause we can't afford a SRT. I'm very jealous and hope to save up enough to get a nice red SRT/10. What are they going for, about 48K now? My 10 year old GTS is worth more than that...damn old artifact that it is.
I've never understood the assumption that anyone who likes/drives/prefers the looks and style of a Gen 1 or Gen 2 only does so because they can't afford a Gen 3.
I didn't say ALL Gen 3's can be had for 48K obviously.
But you can get an 03 or 04 vert with decent low miles for that.
The point was that some people actually like the Gen 1 and 2's better than the looks of the Gen 3's, as hard as that is to accept.
I basically bought a new 01 GTS with 985 miles on it. I also drove a new SRT with under 2000 miles on it and I can honestly say that I did not see a major difference in the two cars. Definitely did not see or feel a major improvement in the SRT. Maybe some very suttle differences but nothing earth shattering. I could afford either one with what I paid for my GTS and can honestly say I am glad I got the GTS. I think you really can't go wrong either way but some of these guys doing some comparisons are comparing a higher mileage Gen II or Gen I to a new SRT10 which is comparing apples to oranges. Try driving a newer (low mile) Gen II and then compare to a SRT10 and I will bet the difference is MUCH less.
A GTS vs new coupe might have been a better comparison. I have heard that ACR's ride horrible and the shocks rattle. Never driven one myself so I can only go by what others say.I back to backed the 05 I just had just bought for my father in 05 and the 02 ACR I still had back then. After driving the 05, it numbered the days of the 02. I now drive the 06. It is quite simply a better Viper in all aspects. Only arguable one I can see is esthetics. And thats subjective.
Also this gen 3 vs gen 2 crap is stupid, why fight, buy what you like. As far as the argument goes, the pricing on a gen 1 is rock bottom cheap, but it doesnt mean they are any less of a viper. You wont get a low mileage coupe (as this title states) for 48k, just wont happen. Now can you get a low mileage srt10 from 03/04 for that? maybe/probably. But you certainly can get a low milage GTS for that all day long. So the price points means nothing, thats the market. The market doesn’t determine our love for the cars, or their abilities. I personally dont think an Enzo was worth 1.6 mill, but thats what the market said it was. So pricing is a matter of supply and demand, not cars abilities. That same car when sold for 600k originally does nothing more today at 1.6 mill.
Rant over.
Jon