Help me with my custom fuel system

Kris396ss

Enthusiast
Joined
May 25, 2025
Posts
21
Reaction score
20
Location
New York
Hey guys, I have some fuel system questions I was hoping maybe some of you Viper owners could answer.
My car was harvested of the factory bucket/pump assembly and the design of it is still a little bit of a mystery to me with everything I know about it being from pictures. I've read the thread on upgrading to a gen 3 pump/boost a pump but a few things weren't clear

1) does the factory PUMP itself have a second feed port for the siphon that feeds the bucket, or is there some sort of siphon jet system integrated into the bucket design? I've heard it explained both ways. I assume the former which is what makes upgrading such a pain.
2) I've seen some guys install 255's or even twin pumps into stock buckets, and obviously they lose the siphon feature which feeds the bucket, so how are you keeping the pump submerged when the fuel level is below the top of the bucket? Are you cutting the bottom out and running the pickup outside the bucket? Cutting windows into the bucket?

My setup will require a bypass regulator up front (return system) and since the car will be doing road course/time attack duty, fuel control is is a priority. It also needs to support about 550whp on E85, and to make it all even harder I'm trying to do this on a tight budget.

The Holley billet pump hat for Dodge trucks uses the same top hat style gasket as the Viper, so it'll fit in tank with just trimming/adjustment of the hanger assembly and float rod. It provides provisions for feed/return as well as a wiring bulkhead that can support a 525LPH "hellcat" pump.

The issue with just hanging a big ol' pump in there is fuel control.

Since I don't have the stock bucket, my plan to address this was to simply fab up a stainless steel bucket and then use a Radium siphon jet setup tied to the return to fill the bucket with fuel (the return line would also be re-filling the bucket with fuel). Radium's siphon jet setup is made to provide a crossover for saddle tanks, but filling the bucket is the same concept. It SHOULD work, but no guarantees and I'd likely have to test it out thoroughly with a non flammable solvent seeing if I could starve the bucket with motion.

Plan 2 was to simply run a surge tank, but "simply" really isn't that simple. The first issue becomes what pump hat to use since using the Holley hat AND a surge tank doubles the cost, and either an OEM Viper or Dodge Truck (1/4 the price) pump hat assembly would require a return port to be added and the integrated FPR to be bypassed. Not a big deal, but it's hurdle 1.

Hurdle 2- it is normally considered ideal to use a lift pump that flows at least 1/2 the capacity of the feed pump in the surge tank, which means a 255LPH should work for a 525LPH surge setup.
But already stated, a 255LPH hung in the tank with no siphon assisted bucket or baffling would have no fuel control, which means the pump would likely starve frequently. I know that's the point of the surge tank, but starving the lift pump on every turn I don't think would be very good for pump longevity. Maybe i'm over thinking that, but it just doesn't seem like a good idea to me on a time attack build seeing a lot of G's. Never hurt an in tank walbro personally, but i've killed other (external) pumps from intermittent starvation before.



If you're wondering why i'm not following the old thread and just using a gen 3 pump with a boost a pump and a stock bucket, the main reason is cost. I don't have a stock bucket - $400. Stock gen 3 pumps seem to fetch a premium and I'd still need a boost-a-pump to support my power level (another $300) and then modifications would still have to be made to the factory bucket to provide a return and FPR bypass.

Hydra-mats have been suggested but I've personally seen mixed results on their effectiveness. There's one designed for road course use (it's massive) and it's $1200 by itself.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0625.jpg
    IMG_0625.jpg
    166.2 KB · Views: 19
  • IMG_1422.jpg
    IMG_1422.jpg
    92.5 KB · Views: 20
Last edited:
OP
OP
K

Kris396ss

Enthusiast
Joined
May 25, 2025
Posts
21
Reaction score
20
Location
New York
Aeromotive recently came out with a foam bucket that will fit a top-loader fuel system. Check it out.
If you’re referring to the phantom bucket, I actually run a phantom setup in my impala with twin 340’s. It’s a cool design, and they recently added to it with a siphon jet feed and one way ports for the bladder to keep fuel in that can be purchased with it.

I’ve done some testing with the foam though and it appears to be a gimmick. It doesn’t slow the rate of fuel passing through it in any noticeable way. Tilt the tank and the fuel flows right out through the foam as fast as it would without anything there. I think the only real purpose the foam serves is to hold the soft bladder in place and maintain its shape through the tension of the foam, but the bladder/foam is both expensive and kind of unnecessary on a tank with an opening as wide as the Viper’s since one could construct a solid bucket with adequate capacity instead and just drop it in.

It’s a great idea for tanks with small openings though where it wouldn’t be possible to fit a solid bucket with any real capacity, since you can squish the soft bladder/foam through the opening and it’ll expand inside the tank into a bucket large enough to keep the pump fed.
 

GTS Dean

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 22, 2000
Posts
4,077
Reaction score
424
Location
New Braunfels, Texas
I bought a track car early this year with a big Aeromotive A1000 pump mounted to the frame down low and a gutted OE bucket and top hat. It had AN10 out and AN8 return bulkhead elbows and the suction hose just stuck through the bottom of the bucket to just above the tank bottom. Hoses were super stiff and I'm sure it starved like crazy at anything under 1/2 tank.

I tried rigging up a 15x15 Hydromat, but it wouldn't fit thru the hole without damaging the inner skeleton while attached to the assembly. I sent it back and got an 11x11 cross, then countersunk it up into the bucket for suction. Return still goes back to the bucket, but I drilled 4x1/4" holes so at low fuel it would still keep the mat wet right above the pickup.

It will be vastly better than before, but only time will tell if it works adequately, or not.
 

Attachments

  • 20250629_143015.jpg
    20250629_143015.jpg
    132.6 KB · Views: 10
  • 20250629_143944.jpg
    20250629_143944.jpg
    107.8 KB · Views: 9
  • 20250629_151426.jpg
    20250629_151426.jpg
    103 KB · Views: 11
  • Fuel Module-vent finished.jpg
    Fuel Module-vent finished.jpg
    94.4 KB · Views: 9
  • pump inlet 45-90.jpg
    pump inlet 45-90.jpg
    146.4 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:

Dan Cragin

Legacy/Supporting Vendor
Supporting Vendor
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Posts
1,378
Reaction score
154
Location
LA, CA
I developed several fuel systems back in the day for the Gen 2-3 Track cars, there
are several things to consider, the surge
tank is critical, return systems heat the fuel
so where you put the regulator and how you return the fuel is critical. Also, how you
route the fuel to the rails and return it is important to get good distribution to all the
injectors. If you want to PM maybe I can give you a call.
 
Top