Roe & Paxton guys...please post your dyno sheets

[plumcrazy]

im just doing some more homework. and with a couple comparison threads on the two superchargers i wanna see some comparisons.

 

[viper spray]

742 HP , 695 TQ
Paxton with a good fuel system and the Vec II

 

[00SVTdubs]

good thread... the debate is old but I dont think anyone has posted dyno sheets to compare

 

[Bill B]

Here's mine from last saturday. The car is only making 5lb of boost. I'm headed back to Doug to change my pulleys.

http://dragtimes.com/Dodge-Viper-Timeslip-8996.html

 

[Schulmann]

Bill B what is you setup to pool so much torque with only 5lb boost ?!

 

[99 R/T 10]

Sounds like Bill has a DLM!

 

[Bill B]

DLM level II, Edelbrock headers stock cats Borla cat back and heads by Johns cages in Ft. Lauderdale.

 

[plumcrazy]

good info guys..

anyone else wanna share ?

 

[kwkshift]

There are some dyno's on Roe's site showing a GENII car with his supercharger. You can compare that with Bill B's and others to see how the curves compare.

 

[1TONY1]

im just doing some more homework. and with a couple comparison threads on the two superchargers i wanna see some comparisons.

Why not also look at drag strip numbers too ? Why is Viper Sprays run only 10.6 @ 133 with such good dyno numbers ?

No nitrous: 640 rwhp, somewhere around 640 rwtq ran a 10.16 @ 141mph w 1.527 sixty.

 

[Larry Macedo]

im just doing some more homework. and with a couple comparison threads on the two superchargers i wanna see some comparisons.

Why not also look at drag strip numbers too ? Why is Viper Sprays run only 10.6 @ 133 with such good dyno numbers ?

No nitrous: 640 rwhp, somewhere around 640 rwtq ran a 10.16 @ 141mph w 1.527 sixty.

The same question can be asked of why people only look at the peak numbers Vs the area under the curve. The dragstrip can't always tell the real story unless someone very skilled is behind the wheel.

 

[plumcrazy]

Tony, i am actually looking at the power UNDER the curve as well. I like the curves better on the paxton though. im NOT a track guy at all. never was never will be. so for ME it doesnt matter too much. im betting you in a VW bug against me in my car is a tough race for me to win..lol

kwkshift, gonna go look now. thanx

 

[Mr Hemi Head]

UBBCode:

The A/F is bogus. On the drive home my wideband was reading a flat 11.5 at WOT in 3rd gear.
There is probably more but I don't feel its necessary to extract the maximum power from this setup.
Rick

 

[Jerry Colpitts]

Here is Mine.

 

[00SVTdubs]

tony, you should drive that paxton car and I bet you run quicker. Driver, track, prep, weather, a lot of reasons why the car ran slower, its really hard to compare.

I do agree however that a roe car is better for autocross.

 

[1TONY1]

tony, you should drive that paxton car and I bet you run quicker. Driver, track, prep, weather, a lot of reasons why the car ran slower, its really hard to compare.

I do agree however that a roe car is better for autocross.

I'm not wanting to only compare my car....just suggesting everyone also post their et's along with the dyno numbers. I have driven a 800+ Paxton car.....I was less experienced with the Vipers at that time though. True...there are a LOT of variables.

 

[1TONY1]

DLM level II, Edelbrock headers stock cats Borla cat back and heads by Johns cages in Ft. Lauderdale.

Nice numbers Bill...those gen1's really respond to mods....of course the DLM part doesn't hurt !!

 

[FikseGTS]

here is a list of a few supercharged dyno sheets.....

http://www.dragtimes.com/Dodge--Viper-Dyno-Sheets.html

there is a paxton SRT in there.....

 

[plumcrazy]

good link...thanx