I bought a leftover new car.
I would have to agree with Joe117. If you can't buy it for around the best price plus zero to very little, of the lowest mile, nicest condition of the same year pre-titled car then your not gaining much. Original owner status and maybe an extra year of warranty, which both are worth something IMO.
My case was I paid about 2 grand more than that of the nicest lowest mile Blue and White I could find. With two exceptions - one car had 8k miles any they wanted in the 70's for it, and one with 1,100 miles they wanted 62k for it. Why pay more for a used when I could buy a new never titled for less?
I looked at it like, a Gold warranty would cost me at least 2 grand, so I'm getting a brand new car, full factory bumper to bumper warranty , I'm the original owner of record, the purchase paid my following years of VCA dues - new car purchase does that, it was a new 1997 in 2003, kind of a find IMO, it was the better choice for me, even though I might have been able to buy 2 grand cheeper.
I think it's slightly different in my case dealing with a 97 bought in 03 vs. an 02 bought in 03. It's not hard to be the original owner of an 02 in 03. It is kinda hard to become the original owner of a 97 in 03. That's worth something to me. Plus for me it was a Blue/White issue. Once I started looking at them I just had to have one, what better one to get than a new one?
But Joe is correct don't over pay for a leftover.