Tuning By Sean Roe...

Madduc

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 17, 2006
Posts
510
Reaction score
0
Location
Fremont,MI
Well maybe I'll just fudge in an extra 40hp. On a local Dynojet with the 8lb on, I made 660. Figured the #'s would be lower on the Mustang, but with the 10lb on and Sean tuning it thought the # would have been more than the 649 I got. Hope to make it out to the same dynojet this week and see what it makes now. Figured your car was going to put out some serious numbers compared to mine, nice build you have done.
 
OP
OP
P

Prof

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Posts
25
Reaction score
0
Location
East Palatka, FL
Well maybe I'll just fudge in an extra 40hp. On a local Dynojet with the 8lb on, I made 660. Figured the #'s would be lower on the Mustang, but with the 10lb on and Sean tuning it thought the # would have been more than the 649 I got. Hope to make it out to the same dynojet this week and see what it makes now. Figured your car was going to put out some serious numbers compared to mine, nice build you have done.

Joe, my hp numbers on a dynojet prior to my forged rebuild with a 5.6 lb pulley 620. On the Mustang after a forged rebuild and running a 10 lb pulley (after Sean tuned it) were not quite 600!

I don't think there is any linear formula...or any index percentage that can be applied. I am going to a dynojet this week just so I can respond to the inquiring minds...my estimate on the dyno will be plus 70 or 80 rwhp for my rig...over the Mustang dyno.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
153,191
Posts
1,681,858
Members
17,686
Latest member
Javadog62
Top