This driving the car "before" purchase was a bone of contention with me when I bought my current Viper. I had looked at 3 Vipers each at different dealers around the Toronto area, who did let me drive the Viper, with them in it of course- no problem. I then came across the car I really wanted which was near Quebec. At the time, talking to the sales agent on the phone, he said he would open up shop on a Sunday to take me for a tour and test drive. So I hiked up a good distance, met the sales rep. and then he seemed to get nervous and told me that the car had a dead battery. I said "thats ockay" because it was the OTHER Viper I had come to see. It was obvious he was expecting someone older showing up (although I'm not young either) He went on and on about insurance and they weren't officially open, blah, blah, blah. Even after explaining to him I was serious and had owned many high power cars prior, and had driven a couple of Gen II Vipers he wasn't going to let me drive it so I said I would get back to him. I had an ethical dilemma for a couple of days. I was NOT going to buy the car based on the simple fact that he would not let me drive it - I mean how could I compare the Gen III to the Gen II without driving one? I understand his hesitation, but honestly, if a car is used and the driver has previous experience, you should have the right to drive it if you are dead serious. I was going to buy the second choice car in Toronto plainly based on this situation alone. But I finally bought the one near Quebec because it was really the car I wanted. I was ready to bury this hatchet - after all, the owner of the Viper or dealer do have right of refusal, even if it means losing a potential buyer. But what still leaves a bad taste in my mouth was that after finally purchasing this car, with the deal done, they (the dealer) suddenly had no problem letting the detail kid drive it, the theft etching shop drive it, and god knows how many others until I finally came to pick it up.