The Viper is a Rather Cheap Shed Built Supercar if You Could Call it That

v10enomous

Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 1, 2009
Posts
5,248
Reaction score
0
Location
NW Jersey
According to this... This is from another thread but warrants a separate post.

The SLS AMG is NOT Based on a Defunct Viper Project... - autoevolution

The SLS AMG is NOT Based on a Defunct Viper Project...
STORY HIGHLIGHTS:
Text size - +

* The Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG was developed in-house by AMG
* We found out it has absolutely nothing in common with Dodge



."I keep six honest serving-men
(They taught me all I knew);
Their names are What and Why and When
And How and Where and Who."

Rudyard Kipling

About a week ago, a rumor started by Edmund's Inside Line spread out all over the internet like an erratic fungus on crack. So many so-called automotive journalists/bloggers jumped on the bandwagon and covered this story as if it was undeniably true, without so much as a single editor to verify the facts. In short, Inside Line claims to have found out that the Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG is actually based on a burried next-generation project for the Dodge Viper. Apparently, the project had been stolen by Daimler before the "de-merger".

Obviously, everyone assumed that since this information is coming from Edmund's itself - which is one of the most trusted auto-related publications on the internet – then they don't need to dig any further. It's like a higher power had given them all the facts and they weren't supposed to question any of it.

Apparently, this is how online automotive journalism works these days. If the original source for an article comes from a powerful entity like American Edmund's, Motor Trend, Car&Driver or European Autocar, Auto Express or even Auto, Motor&Sport, then the website/blog covering the story is exempted from adhering to regular journalism rules.

In other words, you can base entire so-called pieces of news on big fat lies and nobody will suspect anything. The added dose of credibility coming from heavy names is too much for anyone to question the truthfulness of the facts being stated.

The same thing happened with the aforementioned story from Edmund's Inside Line. Nobody even bothered to check an official source, or at least one which doesn't resemble a totally made-up piece of news. We try very hard not to be like that here at autoevolution, even though we're also far from being completely innocent in this matter.

So it happens I took the liberty of doing a small investigation into the matter, and the conclusion I arrived to was rather opposite to what some of you would probably expect. After having a small chat with each party involved in the rumor (Daimler AG and Chrysler, subsequently) I found out the following. First of all, it is true, the SLS AMG isn't a true Mercedes-Benz.

That is because it's an AMG, not a Dodge/Chrysler. The car was developed from scratch by AMG with the help of HWA, which some of you may know from the German DTM racing championship, while other ******** fans might remember that HWA comes from Hans Werner Aufrecht. Yes, the "Aufrecht" in Aufrecht Melcher Grossaspach. It is their first ever semi-independent car project, and apparently Mercedes-Benz as an entity was even less involved with it than it had been with the SLR McLaren.

Second of all, common sense would tell any wannabe car journo that the Dodge Viper is a rather cheap supercar, if it can even be called that, due to the amount of performance it provides. The 271 kilograms (597 pounds) aluminium space frame body of the SLS AMG has manufacturing and research costs about three times those of the steel body of a regular Viper. Also, the double clutch transaxle setup of the transmission in the modern Flügeltüren doesn't come very cheap either, compared to a torque-resistant six-speed manual in a Viper.

How on Earth would someone go from a "shed-built" super sports car with a V10 that originally came from a truck and then build its next generation using space ace technology? Oh, and keeping its more than reasonable price, I should add, because I don't think there are that many clients for a $250,000 Dodge, no matter how technologically-advanced it is.

In the end, all I want to do is congratulate all the automotive e-zines who didn't cover the aforementioned "The Krauts stole our Viper! Those basterds!" story. Apart from being unfounded and simply based on a hunch which probably arose from those early SLS with Viper body parts spy-shots, the rumor is also a bit stupid. Last, but not least, I really do hope that in the future, small automotive websites and blogs will actually begin to rival the real professionals, who so far are still working in print media only. There are more journalistic rules than just the "five Ws"...
 

Coloviper

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Posts
1,883
Reaction score
0
Location
Colorado
Say what he will but I am pretty sure there is some truth to it! I personally saw the car in disguise with my own eyes here on the outskirts of Denver, Colorado when they were testing for high altitude driving tests in the Rockies a few years ago, like all manufacturers do with new models and prototypes. It definitely had a hacked up Viper body kit on it. I guess it could have been all M-B engineering but I could not get pictures as they had too many people around the car. It was in a convoy area with other M-B cars. Most all newer cars like this park overnight at the Hilton Garden Inn in Highlands Ranch, right off of C-470. Happens every summer, every year.

This most like is some kind of late retraction requested by M-B as they probably feel it will really hurt SLS sales if people knew the truth. Typical!
 

99 R/T 10

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 4, 2001
Posts
10,314
Reaction score
0
Location
Enterprise, AL USA
That guy is full of ****. He is busting on the Edmunds Journalist saying:

In other words, you can base entire so-called pieces of news on big fat lies and nobody will suspect anything. The added dose of credibility coming from heavy names is too much for anyone to question the truthfulness of the facts being stated.

Yet he goes on to say that the "shed-built" super sports car with a V-10 that originally came from a truck? What a *********. How about he goes out and does some actual research? :mad:
 
OP
OP
V

v10enomous

Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 1, 2009
Posts
5,248
Reaction score
0
Location
NW Jersey
I love how he jumps into the Blog when you open the link... Amazing how freaky some of these import lovers get while trying to defend how their brilliant engineers need to spend 3 to 5 times as much money to build a higher maintenance barely competitive car...

The SLS AMG is NOT Based on a Defunct Viper Project... - autoevolution

# Alex.Oagana :
02.07.2010 | 12:43 GMT

Thanks for the comments everyone!

@Kma
I apologise, by "steel body" I actually meant chassis. In the SLS AMG the chassis includes the body (monocoque) and it's called an aluminium space frame. The Viper's chassis continues to use tubular steel, while what's left of the body (as in hoods, doors, etc.) is made from fiberglass panels - just like in pretty much any kit car that you can build in your backyard/garage.

As far as the truck engine affirmation goes, you have to be kidding. The V10's origins reside in the Chrysler LA engine family, and a version of it used to power the Ram. So yeah, it IS a truck engine that's been modified to deliver sportier credentials by using an aluminium block and heads with the help of Lamborghini engineers.

If you think that you know otherwise, please do share your insights.
 
Last edited:

Dom426h

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Posts
2,632
Reaction score
0
Location
DE
apparently He hasnt done his research. perhaps someone should foward this to him:

http://forums.viperclub.org/2607290-post11.html



attachment.php
 

Zentenk

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Posts
686
Reaction score
0
So... how does this shed built, low quality, truck powered car manage to blow so many cars away at the race track?
 
OP
OP
V

v10enomous

Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 1, 2009
Posts
5,248
Reaction score
0
Location
NW Jersey
He goes on to say...

Third of all, and for the last time, please, I beg of you, try to first acknowledge the actual subject of this editorial, and only then comment. This story is NOT about the Dodge Viper, NOR about the Mercedes SLS AMG, it's about bad automotive journalism on the internet and making up news when you don't have any sources.


Ironic how his article is the Poster Child for bad automtive journalism
 

Vic

VCA Venom Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2000
Posts
6,763
Reaction score
0
Laptimes at Laguna Seca
ACR - 1:33 (WINNER)
SLS - 1:40 (LOSER)

What's wrong with their engineering? They can't beat the Viper for any amount of money, it seems. (At least $191,000 for the SLS) They need to dig deeper and figure out what went wrong with their concept. Perhaps they should take a Viper apart and study it.

The SLS wins the ugly contest, too. Costs too much. Slower than an ACR. That's three strikes right there. The only thing that car has to make it desireable is a slight resemblence to the SLS from the 50's, and gull wing doors.
 

Phun70

VCA Venom Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Posts
987
Reaction score
0
Location
Urbandale, Iowa
I love how he jumps into the Blog when you open the link... Amazing how freaky some of these import lovers get while trying to defend how their brilliant engineers need to spend 3 to 5 times as much money to build a higher maintenance barely competitive car...

The SLS AMG is NOT Based on a Defunct Viper Project... - autoevolution

# Alex.Oagana :
02.07.2010 | 12:43 GMT

Thanks for the comments everyone!

@Kma
I apologise, by "steel body" I actually meant chassis. In the SLS AMG the chassis includes the body (monocoque) and it's called an aluminium space frame. The Viper's chassis continues to use tubular steel, while what's left of the body (as in hoods, doors, etc.) is made from fiberglass panels - just like in pretty much any kit car that you can build in your backyard/garage.

As far as the truck engine affirmation goes, you have to be kidding. The V10's origins reside in the Chrysler LA engine family, and a version of it used to power the Ram. So yeah, it IS a truck engine that's been modified to deliver sportier credentials by using an aluminium block and heads with the help of Lamborghini engineers.

If you think that you know otherwise, please do share your insights.

I'd be happy to!! It would appear that your lack of knowledge on the body panels has already been addressed by one of our other learned colleagues. The engine in the Viper is NOT based on the truck engine, the early help from Lamborghini was mostly thrown out and redesigned by dodge engineers, and the Viper engine doesn't have any parts on it that are interchangeable with the truck v10, they are different animals altogether. If you do some research on the construction of the viper all the way back to the gen I you will find out all you want to know about the engine. Try running the truck engine/lamborghini drivel past Dick Winkles and see what he says LOL.:omg::eater:
 

slysnake

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Posts
1,688
Reaction score
1
and the Viper engine doesn't have any parts on it that are interchangeable with the truck v10
That's not quite right. As mentioned in a different thread, the air intake manifold is the same for GenIII and Truck. But I guess the truck engine they refer to must be something pre-viper and not refering to the viper truck.
 

Asp Man

Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Posts
1,472
Reaction score
0
Location
Kelowna B.C., WEStern Canada
I'd be happy to!! It would appear that your lack of knowledge on the body panels has already been addressed by one of our other learned colleagues. The engine in the Viper is NOT based on the truck engine, the early help from Lamborghini was mostly thrown out and redesigned by dodge engineers, and the Viper engine doesn't have any parts on it that are interchangeable with the truck v10, they are different animals altogether. If you do some research on the construction of the viper all the way back to the gen I you will find out all you want to know about the engine. Try running the truck engine/lamborghini drivel past Dick Winkles and see what he says LOL.:omg::eater:

Why feed the troll? Let him back up his claims that it's a truck engine (or fiberglass body, or steel, or whatever) why go on the defensive? He's the one who looks like an idiot making that claim. Let him perpetuate the myth. It only serves to weaken his integrity further and shines the light on his lack of basic knowledge about the car. It's really not worth your time and effort, as it's all lost on the poor fool anyhow.
 

lh4x4

Viper Owner
Joined
May 19, 2009
Posts
118
Reaction score
0
Location
Illinois
The Viper came out in 1992. The V10 cast iron truck V10 came out in the 1995 model year. When they came out I scooped one up. It was rated at 300 hp. It was the best 3/4 ton 8 mpg truck that I ever had. 1996 it went to 310 hp.
 

swexlin

Viper Owner
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Posts
1,357
Reaction score
0
Location
West Chester, PA
I too had a 97 2500 V10 4x4. A great truck, with a great engine, 300 hp, 450 lb-ft. I've since gone diesel some years back, but the iron-block 488 was the *******!:drive:

Just saw a couple at Carisle this past weekend. Made me miss the ol' girl!
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
153,197
Posts
1,681,910
Members
17,696
Latest member
sloth
Top